Tag: FMCG engineering

  • Why We Are Giving Away Our Shutdown Planning Checklist

    Why We Are Giving Away Our Shutdown Planning Checklist

    The Most Expensive Week on Your Production Calendar

    Ask any engineering or maintenance manager in a beverage or FMCG plant to name the most stressful week of their year and the answer is rarely a breakdown. It is the planned shutdown. A shutdown is the one window where every deferred job, every capital project and every compliance item competes for the same few days, with a restart date that production has already promised to the business. Every hour of that window is paid for twice, once in labour, parts and contractor costs, and again in the production the line is not running.

    After more than 25 years of shutdown and project work in Australian beverage and FMCG plants, we have seen shutdowns that restarted early and shutdowns that dragged a week past their date. The difference between them is almost never how hard people worked during the window. It is the quality of the scoping and planning done in the weeks before anyone picked up a tool. That conviction is why we have put our shutdown planning approach into a practical document, the FMCG and Beverage Plant Shutdown Planning Checklist, and made it freely available to download from our website.

    EM10323 HDR
    EM10318 HDR

    Why Give It Away?

    The honest answer is that well planned shutdowns are better for everyone, including us. When we arrive on site for shutdown work, the jobs that run smoothly are always the ones where the scope was locked early, the parts were sighted on the shelf, and the control system changes were written and tested before the window opened. The jobs that turn into overruns are the ones scoped on the back of a purchase order three weeks out.

    We would rather work with plants that plan properly, and we would rather be part of that planning early, when engineering input can still change the outcome. Sharing the checklist costs us nothing except a few trade secrets that were never really secrets, because none of this is complicated. It is simply the discipline of doing the right things in the right order, starting earlier than feels necessary.

    There is also a simpler reason. Our business is family owned and has been built over decades on long relationships with manufacturers, from the largest names in Australian beverage production through to smaller regional operations. Useful, practical help has always been how those relationships start.

    What Poor Planning Actually Costs

    The visible cost of an overrun is easy to calculate: extra contractor hours, weekend penalty rates, expedited freight on the part that should have been ordered six weeks earlier. The larger cost is the one on the production side. A high speed canning or bottling line produces enormous value per hour, and every hour the restart slips is product that was promised to customers and is now not coming. In a contract packing environment, a late restart can mean penalties or a customer quietly moving volume elsewhere.

    Then there are the costs that never appear on a spreadsheet. Work rushed at the end of an overrunning shutdown is work done tired, under pressure, with testing compressed or skipped. That is how a shutdown intended to improve reliability ends up causing the next three months of niggling faults. It is also how safety shortcuts happen, and in our view no schedule is worth that.

    Against all of this, the cost of proper planning is a few structured meetings, a master work list, and the discipline to order long lead items on time. It is the cheapest insurance available in plant engineering.

    EM10104 HDR

    Where Shutdowns Go Wrong

    The failure patterns repeat across almost every site. Scope arrives late, added in the final fortnight by people who were not in the early meetings, and every late addition bumps something else off the critical path. Long lead items are ordered on optimistic assumptions, so the gearbox or the PLC hardware arrives the day after the window closes. Contractor crews are booked late in shutdown season, when the good tradespeople are already committed. And control system work is treated as something that happens during the shutdown, rather than something developed and bench tested beforehand, so the window that should have been used for installation and commissioning gets consumed by programming.

    That last one deserves special attention, because it is the most common gap we see. PLC changes, HMI updates, drive replacements and safety circuit modifications all need engineering time before the shutdown and structured testing time during it. When we delivered the automated control system for two glycol refrigeration units cooling large beer tanks, built on a Siemens 1500 series PLC, the logic was developed and proven before installation, which is precisely why commissioning went to plan. The same applied to the hot water rinse system we implemented for a can seamer clean in place process on a Siemens 1200 series platform. Control work rewards preparation, and punishes improvisation.

    What the Checklist Covers

    The checklist is a working document, not a glossy brochure. It walks through six phases of a shutdown, starting eight to twelve weeks out and finishing after the line is handed back. The early sections cover building a single master work list across mechanical, electrical and automation scopes, ranking every job by production risk, and identifying the design, fabrication and long lead items that decide your critical path. The middle sections deal with parts, people and engineering readiness: confirming deliveries in writing, locking in contractor crews, backing up every PLC, HMI and drive parameter set, and walking every job at the machine before the window opens.

    The later sections cover the shutdown itself and what follows: protecting the critical path shift by shift, testing safety functions as they are reinstated, recommissioning system by system, and holding the review that makes the next shutdown easier. Each item exists because we have watched its absence cost a plant real money.

    One recommendation in the checklist is worth highlighting here. A shutdown window is the cheapest opportunity you will ever get to deal with control system obsolescence. Legacy Allen Bradley and Siemens hardware moves steadily through manufacturer lifecycle stages, and a planned migration during a scheduled window costs a fraction of an emergency migration after a failure. If your site has processors that have run untouched for fifteen years, the next shutdown is the time to act, and the checklist prompts you to assess exactly that.

    EM10307 HDR

    How to Use It

    Download it, print it, and take it into your next shutdown planning meeting. Mark it up, argue about it, and adapt it to your site, because every plant has its own quirks and no generic document survives contact with a real production line unchanged. Its job is to make sure the right questions get asked early enough for the answers to matter.

    Use it alongside your existing maintenance systems rather than instead of them. The checklist does not replace a CMMS or a project plan. It sits above them as a sanity check that the fundamentals, scope discipline, long lead items, controls preparation, testing and handback, are actually covered.

    Planning a Shutdown? Talk to Us Early

    BevTech Engineering and Automation delivers shutdown work across mechanical, electrical and automation scopes from our Richlands base in Brisbane, with our own machine shop for fabrication and change parts, TUV certified functional safety engineers for compliance work, and deep experience on Allen Bradley and Siemens PLC platforms. The plants that get the most value from us are the ones that involve us at the scoping stage, when engineering input can still shape the plan rather than rescue it.

    The checklist is available to download now on our website. And if there is a shutdown on your horizon, whether it is three months away or next year, reach out through the contact form on our website and talk it through with our team while the calendar is still your friend.

  • A Day in the Life of a Control Systems Engineer

    More Than Programming

    Ask most people what a control systems engineer does and they will guess it involves writing code for machines. That is part of it, but on an FMCG production site the role is much broader: part electrician, part programmer, part problem solver, and part project coordinator. At BevTech, control systems engineers work across Allen Bradley and Siemens PLC platforms on beverage and food manufacturing lines throughout Queensland, and no single day looks quite the same as the last. This article walks through what a typical day actually involves, from the early morning site visit through to the evening handover, to give a realistic picture of the role.

    Early Morning: Reviewing Overnight Alarms

    The day usually begins before arriving on site, reviewing any alarm logs or overnight call outs from client production lines. Modern PLC and HMI systems log fault history in detail, and a control systems engineer will often start by scanning through this data to spot patterns, a drive that has tripped twice in the past week, a sensor giving intermittent readings, or a communication fault between a PLC and a remote input output rack. This early diagnostic work often shapes the rest of the day’s priorities, particularly if a pattern suggests a developing fault that could cause unplanned downtime if left unaddressed.

    Mid Morning: On Site Fault Finding

    Once on site, a significant portion of the role involves hands on fault finding. This might mean tracing a wiring fault back from a motor to a control panel, checking analogue signal integrity on a flow sensor feeding a hot water rinse system, or working through PLC logic step by step to understand why a sequence is not advancing as expected. Fault finding on a live production line requires a particular mindset: working methodically under time pressure, because every hour a line is down is lost production for the client, while never cutting corners on safe isolation procedures.

    This is also where the breadth of BevTech’s specialisation matters. Because the team works across both Allen Bradley and Siemens platforms, a control systems engineer needs to be genuinely fluent in both ecosystems, from Studio 5000 and RSLogix through to TIA Portal, rather than being a specialist in only one manufacturer’s tools.

    Midday: Programming and Logic Development

    Not every day is reactive fault finding. Planned project work often fills the middle of the day, writing or modifying PLC logic for an automation upgrade, building HMI screens that give operators clearer visibility of a process, or configuring a variable speed drive for a new pump installation. This work draws heavily on the engineer’s understanding of the physical process being controlled, whether that is a glycol refrigeration system managing beer tank temperature, or a clean in place sequence cycling through caustic, acid, and rinse stages on a can seamer.

    Good control system programming in an FMCG environment is not just about making a machine run, it is about making it run safely, efficiently, and in a way that is maintainable by the next engineer who has to modify it in five years’ time. Clear, well documented logic is a genuine professional discipline, not an afterthought.

    Afternoon: Client Liaison and Commissioning

    A meaningful part of the role involves direct communication with client site staff and plant managers, explaining a fault in plain language, agreeing a plan for a planned shutdown, or walking an operator through changes made to an HMI screen. On commissioning days, this becomes even more central: testing new or modified control logic against the physical equipment, verifying safety interlocks function correctly, and working through a structured commissioning checklist before signing equipment back over to production.

    Commissioning a new system, such as an automated glycol refrigeration control upgrade or a new hot water rinse sequence, is one of the most satisfying parts of the role. It draws together weeks or months of design, programming, and coordination with mechanical and electrical trades into a single, tangible outcome: equipment running reliably and safely under the new control system.

    Late Afternoon: Documentation and Handover

    Engineering work is not finished when the equipment is running. Updating control philosophy documents, revising electrical drawings to reflect as built changes, and recording programme version history are all essential parts of the job, even if they are less visible than the hands on work. This discipline matters enormously in an industry where equipment often runs for a decade or more, and where the next engineer working on a system, whether from BevTech or elsewhere, needs accurate documentation to work safely and efficiently.

    Evening: On Call Readiness

    Because BevTech provides 24/7 electrical coverage to its FMCG clients, control systems engineers are part of a rostered on call system to support genuine emergencies outside standard hours. A beer tank losing refrigeration control, or a canning line stopping mid shift, cannot wait until the next business day. Being part of this coverage model is a core part of the role, and it reflects the seriousness with which BevTech treats its commitment to keeping client production lines running.

    Skills That Make a Strong Control Systems Engineer

    Technical ability with PLC platforms is only part of what makes someone effective in this role. Equally important is the ability to think through a physical process logically under pressure, understanding not just what a piece of logic does, but why the underlying mechanical or thermal process behaves the way it does, whether that is glycol flow through a heat exchanger or the sequencing logic in a caustic clean in place cycle. Strong control systems engineers develop a genuine mental model of the equipment they work on, not just the code controlling it.

    Communication skills matter just as much as technical depth, since a fault explained clearly to a plant manager, or a commissioning plan agreed clearly with production staff before work begins, prevents far more problems than they solve after the fact. The strongest engineers in this field combine deep technical competence with the ability to translate that competence into plain language for the people who rely on the systems they maintain.

    Working Across Multiple Client Sites

    Unlike an engineer employed directly by a single manufacturing site, a control systems engineer working for an engineering partner such as BevTech typically works across a range of FMCG client sites, from large scale beverage producers to smaller specialist manufacturers. This brings genuine variety, each site has its own equipment history, control philosophy, and operational quirks, and it also builds a much broader base of practical experience than working on a single facility ever could. Engineers who work this way often become the person a client turns to first, precisely because they bring pattern recognition and experience gathered from problems solved elsewhere, not just familiarity with one site’s systems.

    A Role Built on Variety and Trust

    What stands out across a typical day is the sheer variety, technical depth one hour, client communication the next, hands on fault finding followed by careful documentation. It is a role that rewards curiosity, discipline, and a genuine interest in how physical processes and control logic interact. For engineers who want to build a career grounded in real industrial systems rather than purely office based programming, this is exactly the kind of work BevTech offers across its Queensland client base.

  • How PLC Upgrades Cut Unplanned Downtime on Beverage Production Lines

    For procurement and operations leaders in food and beverage manufacturing, few line items are harder to justify in a capital budget than a control system upgrade. There is no new conveyor to point to, no shiny new filler, just a cabinet of relays, terminals, and a processor that has been quietly running the line for fifteen years. Yet ageing programmable logic controllers, or PLCs, are consistently one of the leading causes of unplanned downtime on Australian beverage and FMCG lines, and the cost of deferring an upgrade is almost always higher than the cost of the upgrade itself.

    The real cost of an ageing control system

    When a PLC fails on a production line, the cost is rarely limited to the repair invoice. A stopped filler or labeller on a beverage line can halt an entire production run, idle packaging staff, delay despatch, and in the worst cases put product quality at risk if temperature or pressure control is lost mid process. Add in the premium cost of emergency electrical callouts, the scarcity of technicians who still understand obsolete processor families, and the difficulty of sourcing spare parts for discontinued hardware, and the true cost of an unplanned breakdown climbs well beyond the headline repair figure.

    Older systems also tend to fail without warning. Where a modern PLC and HMI combination can flag drifting performance, intermittent faults, or component wear before a full failure occurs, legacy systems built on superseded processor families generally cannot. Operations teams are left reacting to breakdowns rather than planning around them, which is precisely the opposite of what a procurement function wants from its capital asset base.

    Signs a control system is due for renewal

    There are a handful of reliable indicators that a PLC upgrade should move up the priority list. Recurring, unexplained faults that electricians cannot fully diagnose are usually the first sign. So too is a growing reliance on a single technician or contractor who happens to understand the legacy programming, which creates a serious single point of failure for the business. If the manufacturer has discontinued support or spare parts for the processor family, every additional month of operation is a gamble. Finally, if the current system cannot talk to newer line equipment, vision systems, or data collection platforms, it is actively holding back the plant’s broader automation and reporting goals.

    What a structured PLC upgrade involves

    A properly scoped upgrade is not simply a hardware swap. It begins with an audit of the existing control philosophy, wiring, and I/O, followed by a design phase that maps out the new platform, typically built around Allen Bradley or Siemens processors depending on the existing plant standard and the skills available on site. From there, the programming is rebuilt or migrated, the HMI is redesigned for clarity, and the system is commissioned with minimal disruption to the production schedule, often during a planned shutdown window.

    One useful example is a recent project where an automated control system was implemented to manage two glycol refrigeration units responsible for cooling large beer tanks. The system, built on a Siemens 1500 series PLC with a Siemens touchscreen HMI and ABB variable speed drives, uses temperature and pressure feedback with PID control loops to regulate cooling precisely. Because beer temperature falling out of specification is a critical quality issue, the reliability of that control loop directly protects product quality, not just uptime. This is the kind of outcome a well-executed PLC upgrade should deliver, control that is both more stable and more transparent than what it replaced.

    Building the ROI case

    For an operations or procurement stakeholder, the business case for a PLC upgrade should be built around three numbers, the cost of historical unplanned downtime attributable to control faults, the premium paid for emergency electrical support versus planned maintenance rates, and the risk exposure created by relying on obsolete or single sourced expertise. When these are laid out against the cost of a structured upgrade, the payback period is frequently inside twelve to eighteen months, particularly on lines where downtime directly delays despatch or triggers contractual penalties with retail or wholesale customers.

    It is also worth factoring in the indirect benefits. A modern HMI gives operators clearer fault diagnostics, which reduces the time technicians spend troubleshooting and shortens mean time to repair when issues do occur. Better data visibility also supports broader continuous improvement initiatives, since production data becomes available for analysis rather than disappearing into a legacy black box.

    Choosing the right partner

    Because a PLC upgrade touches safety systems, production continuity, and product quality simultaneously, the choice of engineering partner matters as much as the choice of hardware platform. Bevtech Engineering and Automation has worked across the food and beverage manufacturing sector for over 25 years, with a team of control system engineers, industrial electricians, and TUV functional safety engineers experienced in both Allen Bradley and Siemens platforms. That dual platform capability is particularly useful for sites that have grown through acquisition or expansion and ended up with a mixed fleet of control systems, since it avoids locking the business into a single vendor relationship for future support.

    Bevtech also offers 24/7 electrical shift coverage, which matters during the commissioning phase of an upgrade, when a new system needs close monitoring through its first full production cycles. For plant and operations managers planning a control system renewal, that combination of multi platform expertise and ongoing maintenance support reduces the risk profile of the project considerably.

    Next steps

    If your facility is relying on a control system that nobody fully understands, or your maintenance team is spending more time firefighting electrical faults than running planned preventative work, it is worth having a conversation before the next failure forces the decision. Bevtech Engineering and Automation, based at 25 Silvio St, Richlands QLD, can assess your existing control architecture and outline a staged upgrade path that fits your production calendar and budget cycle. Contact the team on +61 400 881 321 or admin@bevtech.com.au to arrange a site assessment.