Tag: equipment reliability

  • Total Productive Maintenance: A Plant Manager’s Guide to TPM

    Total Productive Maintenance: A Plant Manager’s Guide to TPM

    Maintenance Is Not Only the Maintenance Department’s Job

    In most plants, operators run machines and maintenance fixes them. When something breaks, production waits for a tradesperson. When nothing is broken, maintenance works through a schedule and operators have little to do with the condition of the equipment in front of them. Total productive maintenance starts from the view that this division is the main reason equipment performs below its potential.

    This guide explains what total productive maintenance is, the ideas that hold it together, what it asks of operators and tradespeople, and how to begin without launching a programme that fades in six months.

    What Total Productive Maintenance Is

    Total productive maintenance, usually shortened to TPM, is an approach to equipment management that aims to maximise the effectiveness of plant by involving everyone who works with it. It was developed in Japan in the 1960s and 1970s, with the car component maker Nippondenso generally credited as the first to apply it across a company, and it was set out for a wider audience by Seiichi Nakajima of the Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance.

    Each word in the name does some work. Total means everyone, from operators to managers. Productive means the aim is output, not maintenance activity for its own sake. Maintenance means keeping equipment in the condition it was designed to be in, and improving on it.

    The Six Big Losses

    TPM begins by naming what equipment loses. The six big losses are grouped under three headings.

    Availability losses. Breakdowns, and time spent on setup and adjustment, including changeovers.

    Performance losses. Small stops and idling, where the machine halts briefly and restarts, and reduced speed, where it runs slower than it was designed to.

    Quality losses. Defects and rework during steady production, and losses at startup before the process settles.

    The value of the list is that it makes hidden losses visible. Breakdowns are logged and discussed. A filler that has been run ten per cent below design speed for three years, because it jams if pushed, is rarely recorded as a loss at all.

    How TPM Connects to OEE

    Overall equipment effectiveness is the measure TPM uses to keep score. It multiplies three ratios that correspond to the three groups of losses: availability, performance and quality.

    The figure often quoted as world class is about 85 per cent. It comes from multiplying 90 per cent availability by 95 per cent performance and 99 per cent quality, which gives 84.6 per cent. Treat it as a reference point and not a target. A line with frequent changeovers and many product formats will sit well below a line that runs one product all week, and both can be well managed. The useful comparison is a line against its own history.

    The Eight Pillars

    TPM is usually described as eight pillars resting on a foundation of workplace organisation.

    Autonomous maintenance. Operators take on routine care of their equipment: cleaning, inspection, lubrication and minor adjustments.

    Focused improvement. Small cross functional teams work on specific losses, one at a time.

    Planned maintenance. Maintenance is scheduled on the basis of condition and history, so that it happens before failure.

    Quality maintenance. Equipment conditions that cause defects are identified and controlled, so that quality is built in and not inspected in.

    Early equipment management. What has been learned from running and maintaining existing plant is fed into the design and purchase of new plant.

    Training and education. Operators and tradespeople are given the skills the other pillars require.

    Safety, health and environment. Improvements must not introduce risk, and a well maintained plant is a safer one.

    TPM in administration. The same thinking is applied to planning, purchasing and other support functions that affect the floor.

    No plant needs to start with all eight. Most begin with the first three.

    Autonomous Maintenance in Practice

    Autonomous maintenance is the pillar that most changes daily life on the floor, and the one most often misunderstood. It does not mean turning operators into fitters, and it does not mean handing maintenance work to production to save money.

    It starts with cleaning, and the phrase used in TPM is that cleaning is inspection. An operator who wipes down a machine at the end of a shift sees the oil weep, the loose guard, the frayed cable and the sensor bracket that has moved. Those observations are tagged and recorded. Simple ones the operator fixes. The rest go to maintenance.

    From there the work progresses in stages. Sources of contamination are removed and hard to reach areas are made accessible. Standards for cleaning, inspection and lubrication are written by the people who will follow them. Operators are trained to understand how their machine works and what normal looks like. Over time, routine checks move from maintenance to the operator, and tradespeople are freed for work that needs their skills.

    What Changes for the Maintenance Team

    TPM is sometimes resisted by tradespeople who see it as a threat. In practice it moves them up the value chain. With operators handling routine care and early detection, maintenance spends less time on callouts and more on planned work, condition monitoring, root cause analysis and equipment improvement.

    It also raises the standard expected. When operators raise fifty defect tags in a month, maintenance has to deal with them. A backlog of tags that nobody acts on is the fastest way to end operator involvement.

    Why TPM Programmes Fail

    It is launched as a campaign. Posters and a kickoff event, then nothing changes in how time is allocated.

    No time is given. Operators cannot clean and inspect if the line is never stopped for it. If ten minutes a shift is not protected, autonomous maintenance does not exist.

    Tags are not closed. Operators report defects and see no response.

    It is run by one department. TPM owned only by maintenance, or only by a continuous improvement team, misses the point of the first word.

    The equipment is too far gone. A machine with years of accumulated defects has to be restored to a sound base condition before operators can be asked to keep it there.

    Measures are used to judge and not to learn. If OEE becomes a stick, the data stops being honest.

    How to Start Small

    Choose one line or one machine, preferably one that matters and has a willing team. Measure its losses for a few weeks to establish a baseline. Stop it for a day and carry out an initial clean with operators, tradespeople and supervisors working together, tagging every defect found. Fix the defects, starting with safety and with the ones causing losses. Write simple cleaning and inspection standards with the operators. Protect a short period each shift to carry them out. Review the tags and the numbers every week.

    Run this for three months, show the result and then move to the next machine. A plant that restores and sustains one line has learned more than one that announces TPM everywhere.

    The Role of Outside Engineering Support

    The initial clean on a neglected machine typically produces a long list of defects, and many are beyond what an in-house team can clear alongside normal work: worn parts with long lead times, guards that need remaking, sensors in the wrong place, sources of leakage that need a design change. Getting through that list quickly matters, because the momentum of a pilot depends on people seeing their tags acted on.

    Industrial electrician shift cover in Brisbane.

    Where BevTech Fits

    BevTech is a family owned engineering business in Richlands, Brisbane, with more than 25 years in beverage and FMCG manufacturing. Plants running improvement programmes use us to clear the engineering backlog those programmes uncover: machining replacement and redesigned parts in our own workshop, fabricating guards and covers, relocating sensors, correcting control faults on Allen Bradley and Siemens systems and restoring machines to base condition during planned stops and shutdowns. Our free FMCG and Beverage Plant Shutdown Planning Checklist, available on our website, is a useful companion for planning restoration work.

    If your improvement team has a list of defects that is growing faster than it is closing, use the contact form at bevtech.com.au/contact.

  • MTBF and MTTR Explained: How Often Equipment Fails and How Fast You Recover

    MTBF and MTTR Explained: How Often Equipment Fails and How Fast You Recover

    Two Numbers That Describe a Line’s Reliability

    When a production line underperforms, the first argument is usually about why. Maintenance says the equipment is old. Production says repairs take too long. Both may be right, and without numbers the argument never ends. MTBF and MTTR are the two measures that separate the questions. One tells you how often equipment fails. The other tells you how long it takes to get it back.

    This guide explains what each measure means, how to calculate them, how they combine into availability and how to decide which one to work on.

    What MTBF Means

    MTBF stands for mean time between failures. It is the average length of time a repairable piece of equipment runs before it fails. A higher figure means failures are less frequent.

    The calculation is total operating time divided by the number of failures in that period. Operating time is the time the equipment was actually running, not the time it was scheduled to run.

    A related term, MTTF or mean time to failure, is used for items that are replaced and not repaired, such as a bearing or a lamp. For a production machine that is repaired and returned to service, MTBF is the right measure.

    What MTTR Means

    MTTR stands for mean time to repair. It is the average time taken to restore equipment after a failure, measured from the moment it stops to the moment it is producing again.

    The calculation is total downtime from failures divided by the number of failures.

    Be aware that the letter R is used in different ways. Some organisations mean repair, some recovery and some respond, and the clock starts and stops at different points in each. What matters is that your site chooses one definition and keeps to it. The most useful for production is the full stop to start time, because that is what the plant actually loses.

    A Worked Example

    A packaging line was scheduled to run for 400 hours in a month. It had 8 failures, which together caused 20 hours of downtime.

    Operating time is 400 hours less 20 hours, which is 380 hours.

    MTBF is 380 hours divided by 8 failures, which is 47.5 hours. On average the line runs for about two days of continuous production between failures.

    MTTR is 20 hours divided by 8 failures, which is 2.5 hours. On average each failure costs two and a half hours.

    How They Combine Into Availability

    Availability is the proportion of scheduled time that equipment is able to run. It can be calculated directly from the two measures: MTBF divided by the sum of MTBF and MTTR.

    For the example, that is 47.5 divided by 50, which is 95 per cent. The same answer comes from 380 operating hours out of 400 scheduled.

    The formula shows something important. There are two ways to raise availability, and they are quite different jobs. If this plant halved its MTTR to 1.25 hours with the same number of failures, downtime would fall to 10 hours and availability would rise to 97.5 per cent. If it instead halved the number of failures to 4, with repairs still taking 2.5 hours each, downtime would also fall to 10 hours and availability would again be 97.5 per cent. The result is the same. The work required to get there is not.

    What Drives MTBF

    Time between failures is mostly determined before the failure happens.

    Maintenance. Whether wear is found and corrected before it causes a stop.

    Operating conditions. Running within design speed and load, correct setup, clean and lubricated equipment.

    Design and installation. Components suited to the environment, particularly in washdown areas, and protection correctly set.

    Quality of repairs. A repair that fixes the symptom and not the cause guarantees the next failure.

    Parts. Correct, genuine or properly made replacements in place of near enough substitutes.

    Improving MTBF is slow. It takes months of consistent maintenance and root cause work before the figure moves, and it is where the largest long term gains are.

    What Is Hidden Inside MTTR

    Repair time is rarely one thing. Break an average stoppage into stages and the picture changes.

    Detection. How long before someone realises there is a failure and not a pause.

    Response. How long until a person who can fix it reaches the machine. Out of hours this can be the largest part.

    Diagnosis. How long to find the fault. This depends heavily on drawings, software access and familiarity with the machine.

    Parts. How long to get the replacement, from the shelf or from a supplier.

    Repair. The hands on work, which is often the shortest stage.

    Restart. Testing, cleaning where product was exposed and bringing the line back to rate.

    In many plants the actual repair is a small part of the total, and most of the time is spent waiting, searching and working out what is wrong. That is good news, because those stages can be shortened quickly and cheaply: current drawings at the machine, software backups, labelled panels, critical spares held on site and a response arrangement that puts the right person there fast.

    Which One Should You Work On

    Look at the pattern behind the averages.

    Few failures, long repairs. High MTBF and high MTTR. The equipment is fundamentally sound and the plant is poorly prepared when it does fail. Work on response, diagnosis and spares.

    Many failures, short repairs. Low MTBF and low MTTR. The team has become very good at fixing the same things. Work on root causes and maintenance, because the skill being shown in repair is being wasted on problems that should not recur.

    Many failures, long repairs. Both are poor. Start with MTTR for quick relief, then turn to MTBF.

    As a rule, MTTR improvements arrive in weeks and MTBF improvements in months. Most plants benefit from starting with the first while planning the second.

    Five Traps in the Numbers

    What counts as a failure. If a thirty second stop is a failure, MTBF will look terrible and MTTR excellent. Set a threshold and treat short stops separately.

    Averages hide extremes. Seven failures of twenty minutes and one of seventeen hours give a similar MTTR to eight failures of two and a half hours. They are different plants. Look at the spread.

    Mixing planned and unplanned stops. Changeovers and cleaning are not failures.

    Too little data. A machine that failed twice in a month has no meaningful average. Use longer periods for reliable equipment.

    Comparing unlike lines. A high speed filler and a palletiser should not share a target. Compare each asset with its own history.

    Starting to Measure

    You need three things for each failure: when the machine stopped, when it restarted and what failed. A shift log will do to begin with. Calculate both measures monthly for each main line, plot them and look at the direction. The trend matters more than the absolute value. If you can also record when the tradesperson arrived and when the fault was identified, you can split MTTR into its stages, which shows exactly where the time is going.

    Where BevTech Fits

    BevTech is a family owned engineering business in Richlands, Brisbane, with more than 25 years in beverage and FMCG manufacturing. We work on both sides of the availability equation. For MTTR, we provide 24/7 breakdown support and shift coverage, fast and methodical fault diagnosis on Allen Bradley and Siemens systems, as-built drawings and a machine shop that can make a part the same day instead of waiting on a supplier. For MTBF, we carry out electrical condition audits, planned maintenance and shutdown work, and engineering fixes for the faults that keep recurring.

    If your numbers show where the time is going and you want help getting it back, use the contact form at bevtech.com.au/contact.

  • Preventative Maintenance Programs: Building a Business Case for Plant Managers

    Preventative Maintenance Programs: Building a Business Case for Plant Managers

    Almost every plant manager agrees, in principle, that preventative maintenance is preferable to reactive repair. Yet preventative maintenance programmes are frequently the first budget line trimmed when cost pressure increases, precisely because the value of preventative work is harder to demonstrate than the cost of performing it. A maintenance technician’s time spent on a scheduled inspection has an obvious, immediate cost. The breakdown that inspection prevented has no invoice attached to it, since it never happened, which makes preventative maintenance a perpetually difficult sell against budget pressure unless the business case is built deliberately and presented in terms that finance and procurement stakeholders find credible.

    Why the default business case often fails

    Plant managers advocating for preventative maintenance investment often default to a general argument about reliability and best practice, which, while true, does not give a finance stakeholder a number to evaluate against the cost of the programme. A more effective business case quantifies the avoided cost directly, drawing on the plant’s own breakdown history rather than industry generalities, since a specific, site grounded figure is far more persuasive than an abstract claim about the value of maintenance in general.

    Structuring the avoided cost calculation

    The core of a credible preventative maintenance business case is a comparison between the historical cost of reactive breakdowns on a specific piece of equipment or production line, and the estimated cost of a structured preventative programme designed to substantially reduce that breakdown frequency. This requires tracking, for the equipment in question, the frequency and direct cost of past breakdowns, the associated downtime and lost production value, and any pattern in failure cause that a preventative programme could realistically address, since not every failure mode is preventable through scheduled maintenance, some genuinely require redesign or replacement instead.

    Once this baseline is established, the preventative programme can be scoped specifically against it, targeting the failure modes most amenable to scheduled intervention, rather than proposing a generic, broad based maintenance schedule that may not address the plant’s actual highest cost failure patterns.

    What a well scoped programme includes

    An effective preventative maintenance programme for FMCG production equipment typically combines several elements. Scheduled mechanical inspection and servicing based on manufacturer recommendations and the plant’s own failure history, rather than a generic interval applied uniformly across all equipment regardless of actual duty cycle or criticality. Proactive electrical audits, checking for developing issues such as loose terminations, component degradation, or control system anomalies before they cause a fault, which is particularly valuable given that electrical faults are frequently among the harder failure modes to predict through purely mechanical inspection alone. Lubrication and wear component replacement on a planned schedule rather than waiting for failure, since planned replacement of a wear component during a scheduled stoppage is dramatically cheaper than the consequential cost of that component failing mid production. And condition monitoring where practical, using vibration, temperature, or control system data trends to flag developing issues between scheduled inspections.

    Prioritising critical assets first

    Not every piece of equipment warrants the same intensity of preventative maintenance investment. A useful prioritisation approach ranks equipment by the combination of breakdown likelihood and consequence severity, equipment that is both prone to failure and whose failure causes significant production or quality impact should receive the most intensive preventative attention, while equipment with low failure consequence, perhaps because of redundancy or low criticality to the overall line, can reasonably operate on a lighter maintenance schedule or even a run to failure strategy in some cases. This prioritisation makes the preventative maintenance budget go further by concentrating resourcing where the avoided cost return is highest.

    Presenting the business case

    When presenting a preventative maintenance investment proposal, the most persuasive structure leads with the historical breakdown cost for the targeted equipment or line, including the full cost picture of lost production, premium labour, and any downstream despatch or customer impact, followed by the proposed preventative programme cost, and finally the expected reduction in breakdown frequency based on the specific failure modes being addressed. This framing positions the preventative investment as a cost reduction measure rather than simply additional spend, which is a far easier proposition for finance and procurement stakeholders to approve.

    Support building and delivering the programme

    Bevtech Engineering and Automation provides preventative maintenance services for food and beverage manufacturers, including scheduled mechanical and electrical maintenance, proactive audits, and condition based monitoring, and can work with plant managers to build a site specific business case grounded in actual breakdown history rather than generic industry assumptions. To discuss developing or refining a preventative maintenance programme for your facility, contact Bevtech on +61 400 881 321 or admin@bevtech.com.au, or visit 25 Silvio St, Richlands QLD.

@Fd2X@HoSi10178
Shutdown Checklist
Bevtech fmcg beverage shutdown planning checklist glass.webp0000

Get Your FMCG & Beverage Plant Shutdown Planning Checklist

We wont spam you :) or share your details.
We will send you an email with the PDF checklist.